In the Name of Allaah…
Recently, the great scholar, Shaykh Saalih ibn Fowzaan al-Fowzaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked:
What is the ruling on rejecting the idea of hatred for the sake of Allaah and claiming that it is not from Islam? Is a person’s Islaam valid if he does not hate the Jews and Christians?
The shaykh responded:
Walaa’ and baraa’ (the islamic system of loyalty) is a must. (It is) disallegiance with the enemies of Allaah and loyalty to the allies of Allaah. Walaa’ and baraa’ means to have hatred, declaring oneself free of them (the disbelievers) and their religion, this is baraa’.
Walaa’ means to love Allaah, to love His Messenger, and to love His believing servants, take them as allies and come to their defense.
“Indeed you have a good example in Ibraaheem (Abraham) and those with him, when they said to their people: We are free of you and all that you worship beside Allaah…” [Meaning of Quran 60:4]
They declared themselves free of them and their idols, their objects of worship.
“…We are free of you and all that you worship beside Allaah. We have disbelieved in you (i.e. your religion), and there shall be enmity and hatred between us forever, unless you believe in Allaah alone.” [Meaning of Quran 60:4]
Thus it is not permissible to love the disbelievers. Whoever takes them as allies, Allaah, the Mighty and Most High, has said [what means]:
“O you who believe! Do not take the Jews and Christians as allies! They are allies of one another. Whoever takes them as allies is indeed from them. Verily Allaah does not guide people who are oppressive.” [Meaning of Quran 5:51]
The issue is very serious. Walaa’ (loyalty) and baraa’ (disallegiance) are from the essential foundations of this Religion. The religion (of a person) is not valid without both of them.
Source: The shaykh’s answer given on 1434/8/23 in Jeddah. [ English & Arabic video / Arabic audio / Arabic transcript ]
As you can see, this hatred which some misguided Muslims try hide and/or negate from Islaam is in fact an absolutely essential concept in Islaam, according to the Quran, the Sunnah, and the scholars of Islaam.
Disclaimer: Muslims have every right to love and hate as their Lord has asked them to. While the non-Muslims typically frown on this concept, Muslims seek to please Allaah, not His disbelieving creation. We do not change our Religion to match the whims of the people and agree with what they feel are acceptable religious beliefs. This does not mean that our hatred is allowed to manifest through acts of transgression against innocent people living in a peaceful society. Allaah says (what means):
“Allaah does not prevent you from dealing justly and kindly with those who have not fought against you nor expelled you from your homelands. Verily, Allaah loves those who deal with equity.” [Meaning of Quran 60:8]
While Muslims are required to love and hate for the sake of Allaah, we are also commanded to be fair and deal with people fairly and kindly. Unjustly transgressing against non-Muslims’ personal safety and property is strictly forbidden in Islam.
And Allaah knows best.
Translation and commentary by: Moosaa Richardson
Shaykh Saalih Al-Fowzaan hafizahullaah said in his explanation of The Three Fundamental Principles regarding the disbelievers, “It is not permissible to wrong or oppress them. He, the Most High, said:
وَلَا يَجْرِمَنَّكُمْ شَنَآنُ قَوْمٍ عَلَىٰ أَلَّا تَعْدِلُوا ۚ اعْدِلُوا هُوَ أَقْرَبُ لِلتَّقْوَىٰ
‘Do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from treating them justly. Do justice, it is closer to taqwaa (being dutiful to Allaah).’”
[Sooratul-Maa~idah (5):8]
Translated by Aboo Talhah Daawood Burbank rahimahullaah (page 7 of this document: http://www.ittibaa.com/uploads/2/8/2/1/2821629/u3_-_08-05-19_-_11.pdf
Imaam Ibn Katheer, may Allaah have mercy on him, mentioned in his tafseer regarding the above Saying:
وَلَا يَجْرِمَنَّكُمْ شَنَآنُ قَوْمٍ عَلَىٰ أَلَّا تَعْدِلُوا
‘Do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from treating them justly’
“…rather implement justice with regards to every person, be they a friend or an enemy.”
Translated by Nasser ibn Najam
May Allaah reward you generously.
assalaamu alaykum,
Interesting article. But are you saying we’re supposed to hate Christians and Jews while hiding that hatred behind a fake smile? Of course, if they are enemies to Islam then there’s not question that we hate them. But just because we keep ourselves completely free of their beliefs doesn’t necessarily mean that hate the followers (Imagine a Muslim man married to his Christian or Jewish wife- is he supposed to hate her?).
wa ‘alaykas-salaamu wa rahmatullaah,
Thank you for visiting, Hassen, and for posting your questions, and may Allaah bless you. Allaah requires our love and hatred (that we CAN control) to be for His Sake. The natural love in our hearts for our parents (regardless of their religion), wives, etc. is something we CANNOT control and thus something we are not held accountable for, wal-hamdulillaah.
Please be careful to read the Quranic passage where Allaah explains that Ibraaheem is our example to follow in this. He said openly, what means, “There is hatred and animosity between us and you forever, until you believe in Allaah alone.” [60:4] So, take note:
1) Allaah narrates this story in the Quran, and all stories in the Quran in general are absolutely accurate and truthful, having lessons and guidance for us to ponder and follow.
2) He further explains that this story specifically includes a good example for us to follow – in Ibraaheem’s dealings specifically.
3) People who put their own opinions first will typically oppose this and say this kind of approach (openly showing hatred and animosity for one’s non-Muslim family members) is without wisdom – in direct contradiction to the Quran!
4) Ibraaheem expressly stated that hatred and animosity are between him and his people (polytheists who opposed the orders of Allah).
5) Regarding this hatred and animosity, he also stated that it shall remain in place, “Until you believe in Allaah alone,” and he DID NOT say: until you stop fighting or oppressing us. This refutes those who would say that Ibraaheem’s example is only for those facing non-Muslim oppressors or agressors.
6) The following verses that mention Allaah does not forbid you from kind treatment of those who do not fight you DOES NOT include the slightest indication that you are allowed to love disbelievers!
7) Showing kind treatment logically does not necessitate love for Allaah’s sake, just as showing rough treatment in some occasions does not necessitate hatred. For example, we may apply capital punishment to some Muslim criminals (within a Muslim government’s judicial process), but then we believe their sins are expiated by the punishment, we love them, and we pray over them, beseeching Allaah’s forgiveness for them.
8) While a Muslim man may have some natural love in his heart for a Christian wife, this is natural love (mahabbah tabee’iyyah) which we do not worship Allaah with, nor are we accountable for. This is outside of our discussion. We are accountable for our shar’ee love, our choice to love or hate based on a person’s relationship with Allaah. You may not have shar’ee love for a Christian wife, rather she is hated for her shirk, and this hatred should be something that leads the person to work hard to guide such a woman.
9) As for the concern regarding a “fake smile” – then we say: Our smile and nice treatment in response to non-Muslims’ similar behavior is in accordance with Allaah’s Command (60:8), just as our hatred and animosity for them because of their kufr is in accordance with His Command as well. We do not confuse the issues and assume that good treatment necessitates that we love them, nor would we go to the other extreme and say that hatred in our hearts means never responding to their kind treatment except with frowns and disrespect. The precise balance of our Muslim behavior is directly from the Book of Allaah, and to Allaah is the praise.
Base your practice of Islaam on the Quran dear brother, not modern opinions and apologetic adjustments of basic Islamic teachings. May Allaah bless you.
I heard that in the book, “Things that Nullify One’s Islaam”, the author states that a Muslim will be regarded as an apostate if he displays love, provides assistance or helps non-Muslims.
I would like to know if this is true and the reason for it.
A man apostates by tawallee of non-Muslims, taking non-Muslims as owliyaa’ (close allies and supporters) over the believers. See: Quran 5:51 and 9:23. The reason is that a basic level of religious brotherhood and loyalty to the Muslims is required in the Religion. And Allaah knows best.
In a particular democratic country, the book is banned as it promotes hatred towards non – Muslims. I do not wish to mention the country but you can find out online.
How should one respond to this?
We respond with what Allaah tells us:
وَلَنْ تَرْضى عَنْكَ الْيَهُودُ وَلا النَّصارى حَتَّى تَتَّبِعَ مِلَّتَهُمْ قُلْ إِنَّ هُدَى اللَّهِ هُوَ الْهُدى وَلَئِنِ اتَّبَعْتَ أَهْواءَهُمْ بَعْدَ الَّذِي جاءَكَ مِنَ الْعِلْمِ مَا لَكَ مِنَ اللَّهِ مِنْ وَلِيٍّ وَلا نَصِيرٍ
“Neither the Jews nor the Christians would be pleased with you until you follow their religion. Say: ‘Verily, the Guidance of Allah is the [only] real guidance.’ If you were to follow their desires after what has come to you of knowledge, you would have no ally or helper with Allaah whatsoever.” [2:120]
They love and hate for the sake of their laws and ideals, while they demonize others for loving and hating for the sake of their Creator, whilst they boast about affording people freedom of speech, expression, religion, etc. Wallowing in hypocrisy, may Allaah guide them.
And Allaah knows best.
Shaykh Ibn Baaz on Love and Hatred for the Sake of Allaah:
https://www.bakkah.net/en/shaykh-ibn-baaz-on-love-and-hatred-for-the-sake-of-allaah.htm
As salaamu alaikum
May Allaah bless u all. Does Yusef Estes statements take him out of the fold of Islam? He and those like him are so dangerous to the Ummah.
Ukht fi Emaan
wa ‘alayk as-salaamu wa rahmatullaah. Yusuf Estes has spread some very serious mistakes, many of which are considered disbelief according to the scholars of Islaam, as documented clearly over the last year or so. I am not able to speak on behalf of Allaah and say that Allaah has excused him for all of that. That is something I have no knowledge of. We pray that Allaah guides him to free himself of such horrible beliefs and teachings. Some of our scholars have warned against him and referred to him as “dhaall, mudhill” (astray, leading others astray), which should be more than enough for any sound-minded Muslim to stay far away from him.
Who will define hate and love? What are the limitation? [Long question abridged by admin]
Please review Moosaa’s detailed response to Hassen above.
AssalamAlaykum,
does this mean we can’t be friends with Non-Muslims? I have a lot of non muslims friends who are very nice human beings and are very helpful and kind to me. While I hate everything they do in line of their religion but other than their religion and shirk, i do love them for all the years they have been with me. Isn’t it okay if we love them excluding their religion just like the prophet pbuh loved Abu Talib?
wa ‘alayk as-salaamu wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh. Abu Talib was a family member. Family members are to be respected and honored, especially one’s parents, and their parents’ siblings and parents as well. Muslims have been commanded to keep family ties and be patient with the attacks and harms they face in that. Many people use the claim that the Prophet (may Allaah raise his rank and grant him peace) loved his uncle to justify friendships with non-Muslims. Firstly, it was an obligation on the Prophet to recognize and try to repay the kindness he received from his disbelieving uncle. Secondly, he was a family member, not a voluntarily chosen friend. Thirdly, he constantly invited him to testify to Allaah’s sole right to be worshipped alone. While you can try to find a way to repay kindness that you have received, Muslims do not take the non-Muslims as friends and allies. Why not invite them to Islaam with every bit of seriousness and sinicerity, seeking Allaah’s Aid? Would you love to see them rejoicing in the delights of the Hereafter or tortured eternally? May Allaah bless you and guide your associates to Islaam.
As salaamu alaykum .
Please read link concering writing Pbuh
https://www.bakkah.net/en/saw-saws-pbuh.htm
What about calling a non-Muslim “a good man” or “a great person” or “good and pure” or “a wonderful person” etc… I know of a man who teaches Islam who described his non-Muslim friends as such, and when Nelson Mandela recently died, he called him “the last of the great ones”. How should I respond to such a person?
Assalaamu alaykum warahmatullahi wa barakaatuhu.
Baarakallahu feek brother moosa for your efforts.
I ask Allah first, and then you to help me comprehend this extremely important issue, issue of al walaa wal baraa.
We love/hate, make friends/enemies purely for the sake of Allah alone.
So we love and make friends with Allah’s friends (the muslims, muwahhids) and we hate and take Allah’s enemies (mushrikoon, kaafiroon) as our enemies.
Q1. Is hating and not having any affection and love and considering kuffar as our enemies, irrespective of the fact whether call of islaam was given to him?
To put it in a single line, is this a shart before we hate them and take them as our enemies that we look whether he rejected islam after being called to it? Or not?
Q2. As for being just with them, is it always applicable or are there exception where we should not be just with them (like fr eg., during war with them)?
Q3. And when to be kind with them and when to be harsh with them?
In 60:8, “Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly with those who fought not against you……………..” to the end of ayah.
In 48:29, “….. and those who are with him(messenger) are severe against the disbelievers………”
In 66:9 or 9:73, “…..and be harsh against them (i.e., disbelievers and hypocrites)……”
When we show kindness and when severity and harshness?
جزاك الله خيرا
Asalaamualaykum wa rahmathullahi wa barakathu
Ustadh,
When we say loving and hating for the sake of Allah azzawjal, what about if they happen to be our neighbors, should we give them the rights of our neighbors?
What about if they happen to be people who call themselves Muslim and have different ideology?
I’ve one of my neighbor who is leader of a political party wing ( who claims to be working for upliftment of Muslims in India).
Another neighbor who is a core member of a social organisation who are claiming to be working for the Muslims education, he hosts regular weekly classes in his house by a Tableeghi.
The other one is a Hindu.
Please guide , how should I treat them, should I treat them with the rights of neighbor, does all 3 to be treated the same?
I need guidance on this matter.
بارك الله فيك
Your neighbors deserve your peaceful and respectful interactions, no matter what religion they are upon. Good treatment does not mean that you love them for the sake of Allaah. You may hate someone religiously, while still observing their rights and fulfilling your agreements and contracts with them. Quite simply, the neighbor has a right over a Muslim to kind treatment, due to the hadeeth (which means): “Whoever believes in Allaah and the Last Day must be kind to his neighbor.” [Bukhaaree & Muslim].
The Hindu is hated for his polytheism, and he is invited to Islam. The Tableeghi is hated for his innovation, and he is invited to the Sunnah. The Hindu is not claiming to be a Muslim, and thus no Muslim is tricked into following him. Yet the Tabeleeghi says he is a Muslim, a follower of the Quran and Sunnah, so he looks for ways to legitimize his deviation and make it seem acceptable. This is where special caution is needed. May Allaah keep us from misguidance.
Is it permissible for us to share food with these neighbors Ustad?
Please enlighten us
بارك الله فيك
“Abdullaah b. ‘Amr (radiyallaahu ‘anhumaa) mentioned that he slaughtered a goat or sheep and then said to his servant:
“Did you send some to our Jewish neighbour? Indeed I heard the Messenger (salallaahu ‘alaihi wassallam) say: “Jibreel did not cease to exhort me concerning the neighbour until I began to think he would inherit from me!”
(An authentic naration, see Al-Irwaa, 891.)”
http://www.abukhadeejah.com/how-to-conduct-oneself-with-the-jews-christians-others-even-if-they-be-tyrants/
In the same article, he also said elsewhere..
“the origin here is that one is to show kindness, gentleness and justice towards the unbelievers amongst whom we live. This treatment is from justice, and a means of da’wah and giving them a beautiful insight into Islaam. “
Yet, with an innovator, there are complications that keep the issue from being this easy. The innovator may try to show his supporters that Ahlus-Sunnah love him by bringing him gifts. He may say words of confusion to plant seeds of hypocrisy and doubts when people try to deliver food. For this reason, some of the Salaf would say: I would prefer to eat with a Jew or Christian over eating with an innovator. And Allaah knows best.
My name is Constantine Stambolitis. I’m a non-Muslim. The Hadith that says about hating the Arabs is bad because the prophet is one. If the Arabs went back to paganism, would the Hadith not partially apply anymore due to having bara for the sake of Allah and would hating the Arabs be permissible than?
Yes, your understanding is correct. Many Arabs refused to submit themselves in obedience to their Creator in the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad (may Allah raise his rank and grant him peace), from his own family and tribe. While he was compassionate and merciful, calling them to Islam, he also hated their paganism, as he hated them for their paganism and disbelief, as do all believers who follow his way. So love and hate for the sake of our Lord is part of our worship of Him, loving those whom He loves, and hating those whom He hates. May our Lord and Creator show us what is best for us in this Life and the Hereafter, and grant us the strength and fortitude to stick to it, despite whatever opposition and hardship we may face. We beg Him for His merciful guidance!
How does one combine compassion in da’wah with hatred for the called? [Admin: Thank you for the excellent question!]
By understanding towheed, and that it is the reason from the people’s existence in the first place:
وما خلقت الجن والإنس إلا ليعبدون
“I have not created Jinn nor mankind except that they are to worship Me.” [51:56]
And then by understanding the severity of shirk and how hated it is to Allah:
تكاد السماوات يتفطرن منه وتنشق الأرض وتخر الجبال هدا أن دعوا للرحمن ولدا
“The heavens nearly crack, the earth nearly splits, and the mountains nearly crumble in ruin, due to their claim that ar-Rahmaan (the Most Merciful) has a son!” [19:90-91]
Hating that genuinely for the Sake of Allah, but without transgressing, following the role model of your Prophet (may Allah raise his rank and grant him peace), who was patient and kind, his love and hatred was for the Sake of Allah alone, yet he was compassionate and concerned, genuinely wishing guidance and success for the people, and he worked hard to save whomever he could. May Allah raise his rank and grant him peace! And may Allah give us success in holding fast to his example and guidance! And Allah knows best.
I am a Non-Muslim and I would like to know your response to Muslims who say Ibrahim said this to his people because they tried to throw him into the fire and oppressed him. These Muslims say that this example is only for people who oppress you…
Quite simply, Ibrahim did not say: “…until you stop harming me” or the likes, when setting the limit of his opposition to them. His exact words were (حتى تؤمنوا بالله وحده), “…until you believe in Allah alone.” So the explanation you are quoting does not actually fit with the actual wording of the text nor its context. Rafael, Ibrahim was real, and his clash with his people was real, and all of our Lord’s prophets and messengers faced difficult trials of opposition and persecution. It was their test which was decreed for them. They were amazing people, upright and steadfast, beautiful guides for you and me, so we could understand and embrace our Lord’s guidance, and know how to live upon it. I advise you, based on true concern, that you do not get caught up in points of differing about the Speech of your Lord, but that you be humble and embrace it, and whatever you do not understand about it, you ask about it and attempt to understand it, otherwise leave its meanings for later attempts to understand it, and Allah knows best about it. May your Merciful and Benevolent Lord and Creator guide you to what is best for you in this life and the Next.
Here are some resources to learn about Islam:
https://sau.posthaven.com/what-is-a-muslim-abu-khadeejah-abdul-waahid
https://sau.posthaven.com/a-dawah-session-to-non-muslims-students-of-brookdale-college-new-jersey-abu-awais-abdullaah-alee
https://sau.posthaven.com/my-coming-to-islam-abu-hakeem-bilal-davis
https://sau.posthaven.com/jihad-the-misconceptions-cleared-dot-abu-uwais-abdullah-alee
https://www.salafisounds.com/follow-your-lord-not-satan-by-abu-khadeejah/
https://www.salafisounds.com/mannerisms-of-the-muslims-with-the-non-muslims-by-abu-khadeejah/
https://www.troid.org/category/leaflets/
https://www.bakkah.net/en/why-are-we-here.htm
what was the shirk of the jews regarding their rabbis? I could not find anything on this in Kitaab at tawheed.
Allah has said:
اتخذوا أحبارهم ورهبانهم أربابا من دون الله
“They (i.e. the Jews and Christians) took their monks and rabbis as lords beside Allah…” [9:31]
Ibn Katheer mentions that Ibn ‘Abbaas, Huthayfah, and others explained:
إنهم اتبعوهم فيما حللوا وحرموا
“They (both the Jews and Christians) followed them (their religious leaders) when they made things halaal and haraam [in opposition to what Allah had legislated].”
And Allah knows best.
Is Imam al albani a Murjiah and if so can we can from his opinions. I heard sheikh al fawzan say he had irja?
Shaykh al-Albaanee was an imaam from the imaams of Ahlus-Sunnah, may Allah have Mercy on him. He had some expressions and generalizations that some scholars considered to be similar to or close to the speech of the Murji’ah. Some of them criticized him about those expressions. Like al-Imam Maalik (may Allah have Mercy on him) said: “There are none of us except that he is refuting someone or being refuted.” No scholar is free of mistakes. Shaykh Saalih al-Fowzaan, a well-known scholar from Ahlus-Sunnah, did not make tabdee’ of Shaykh al-Albaanee, as he personally has confirmed. He has some criticism, yes, but he did not declare Shaykh al-Albaanee to be from the Murji’ah. This is only passed around on the internet by people who hate the people of knowledge and wish to run the people away from them, or people who are confused by them and who fell into their trap, so beware! Ask your scholars about these matters, and stop taking such serious issues from random Youtube clips or facebook posts! May Allah guide us to what is most beloved to Him!